Which technique is NOT used to assess team performance during SRF-A operations?

The technique that is not used to assess team performance during Security Reaction Force – Advanced (SRF-A) operations is inactivity promotion. This term suggests encouraging a lack of action or engagement, which directly contradicts the goals of performance assessment in high-stakes security operations. Effective performance assessments are centered on active engagement, collaboration, and constructive feedback among team members.

In contrast, real-time feedback, peer evaluations, and self-assessments are critical components of evaluating team dynamics and operational effectiveness. Real-time feedback allows team members to adapt and improve their techniques instantly, fostering a learning environment. Peer evaluations promote accountability and provide diverse perspectives on an individual's contributions. Self-assessments encourage personal reflection and responsibility for one's performance, facilitating growth within the team context. Together, these methods enhance overall performance and readiness, which is essential in security operations.